| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Can Rick Rubin save the music business?
Hellaciously long piece, but if you have twenty minutes to kill...from the New York Times Magazine.
Quote:
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. Last edited by The Sheck; 02 Sep 2007 at 12:24 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
continued...
Quote:
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
more......
Quote:
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
and more...
Quote:
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
I told you this was long.
Quote:
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
interesting article so far - think i'll take a nap b4 attempting to read the rest
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Thats an impressively long article. I think Rubin's in for quite a challenge and I think he knows it, the part where the writer mentioned Rubin was optimistic, but wavering seemed very telling. The word of mouth idea is interesting, but the product has to be really compelling and the word of mouth has to be truley enthusiastic and sincere for that to work. Sending people to chat rooms and message boards to shill artists is not sincere, look at how it is handled here when this spammers show up. In a lot of ways some of his ideas are simply variants of the old model they discuss in the article. They mention that often not so good material was kind of pushed through radio, rolling stone and tower until it was a success. Now hes suggessting pushing the same kinda thing through message boards and TV shows. The music he may have discovered/produced/signed may be of a better quality than the past but its still kinda the same model.
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Also, the biggest obstacle is the argument about online file sharing. They mention that their focus group said that they mostly stole music, but didnt consider it stealing. That attitude is an obstacle. Not to argue the point here, but people have strong feelings about it. The bottom line is in most cases if you dont pay for music, the artist isnt getting any money and thats going to hurt the business overall. If musicians, good musicians, cannot make money off this, we may have less and less good music out there. I am not defending the record companies, by saying that, the model is most certainly flawed. Bun not paying for music certainly somewhere along the trail cannot be good for the artist and the business, no matter what justification is used to defend the choice to obtain music that way. The record industry must come up with a way to combat this without alienating the shrinking audience by suing the crap out of them and calling them thieves. Subscription models? iTunes downloads? Hell, I dont know what the answer is, I think the closest thing may be iTunes or another entity becoming a label and directly distributing music online. some people still want their physical media and liner notes, but in 10, 20, 50 years is physical media still going to be a necesisity? Probably not. Maybe someone, Apple, indy labels create direct distribution models, eliminating the need for A&R guys, labels and all the overhead of CDs. The artists "sign" with these labels, create music their way, distribute electronically through individual downloads or a subscription method, and the artist and the "label" split the money. I dont know. Its certainly interesting and may be a very tiny right step to give Rubin some of this power and a chance to straighten the monolithic structure in place now.
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
i read the article this a.m.---glad somebody posted it.
even though rubin is yesterday's producer, i sort of agree with him that songwriting often needs more structure and punch. i like how he'll throw 8 songs out in favor of the 2 strong ones and tells the act to go write some more. it runs counter to the indie style, but there's lots of material out there that would have more sizzle with a little reworking and lots of albums that have more potential than resolution. not sure about the subscription idea. digital technology threatens to derail most paradigms that try to corral it in.
__________________
of course i've always been warren |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Damn, that was a long article. I think Rick Rubin has more than proven his ability for rescuing the careers of many musicians on the brink of extinction, but it's going to take many more than one Rick Rubin to save the music industry.
As an aside, I've always thought (and still think) that Bob Pollard and Rick Rubin need to collaborate.
__________________
Every Issue Presents Itself Sudden Outburst Radio That sounds about as exciting as a huge post count. - Sean/JSpace Note to self: Do not put Chapstick next to Glue Stick in desk drawer. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
saw this yesterday and started reading it... when i got to the bottome of the page and saw that there were like 6 or 8 more to go i said 'oh well, the first page was interesting.'
![]() but i went straight to u2b to check out 'the Gossip' that the article mentions. the first song/video i saw was kinda so-so. then i watched two more, and they were good. i like his approach of focusing on music instead of on ways to sell music... the US auto industry had to be smacked upside their corporate heads to realize that the 'product' really does matter. good luck, bear-man. :]
__________________
great jones street is in nyc but oh well |
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
hasn't the Gossip been around for a few years now? And don't they already have records out? They had a song on the radio a year ago--at least here in LA--when they put out an album on Kill Rock Stars. All references to them as a "new band" prepping their "first release" just reinforced, to me, how clueless the majors are in this day and age. Being indie is not the same as being unknown, especially today.
__________________
Pretty Goes with Pretty |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think they mean first release for Columbia, and 'new' is relative these days, yes? Barely anyone in the mainstream has heard of the Gossip.
I'm interested to know what you all think of Rubin making Columbia ditch the jewel case in favor of something more 'green.' Some people think this will scratch up CDs faster if it was some kind of slipcase, but there are ways around this and be environmentally-friendly, I would imagine.
__________________
A good day is any day that you're alive Yes a good day is any day that you're alive. Randomville -- killing indie credibility one reader at a time. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
no expert on packaging here, but i applaud any effort to be more green, especially from such a large corporation - here's hoping that all of the other record companies rush to do the same
overall though, i don't think the powers that be are desperate enough *YET* to follow through w/ the most significant of Rubin's ideas...the subscription model makes sense to me & i think it's inevitable - but the question is: how long will it take? i'm guessing it is still over 5 years away |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
funny, i tend to think that $ could be made by some sort of new direction in edition packaging-as-art for the collector with dough who wants to handle and display his music. i think there's a subliminal longing for the object that gets channeled into vinyl sales, but perhaps could be better exploiited in cd packaging, which is flimsy, pathetic and deeply unsatisfying on all levels. naturally you want to get rid of that shitty jewel case, but something human is missing when the music goes into the ipod.
just a tangent... edited to add: if the record labels really want any prayer of hogging in on band t-shirt profits, then they'd better come up with better t-shirt designs and higher quality, team up with fashionistas and come up with something that the artists couldn't manufacture cheaply on their own. every time i pick up vogue these days there's some high fashion ad with an indie band in it (though the brits, being more fashion conscious, are ahead of the game on this).
__________________
of course i've always been warren Last edited by akip; 03 Sep 2007 at 08:58 AM. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
of course i've always been warren |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My purchase of Dark Side Of The Moon was as much for the album art and posters as it was for the music at the time. This was the flip side of the Yes coin, as this album has proven to be one of the most sought-after albums even to this day. Of course, an argument can be made for the usefulness of the fold-out album art for keeping a stoner's attention as he used the album to de-seed his pot.
|
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Simply No.
A record company or even Mega-producer cannot save music. Its terrestrial Radio that has killed music. Already, a generation of music listeners is growing up without finding good quality music, free on radio. They've gone elsewhere for their music. Listeners are already disenchanted by CCC's offerings, and it has already begun to translate into changes at the company. But by the time, CCC's stock declines enough to where the company is broken up, radio will lose its long time place as the source of music buyers in the US. We're talking about the average joes here, not your general woxyian. Already places like iTunes have begun assuming the mantle of source for all things music, but its not enough. People haven't assimilated iTunes like Steve Jobs would like them to, but also because it has its own inherit cult-like flaws. Radio, simple and free, cannot be replaced by a website with Satanic software. I think there is a built in horse-race going on here, between CCC, satellite and internet radio, for the future of the real source of music CD sales, but in the mean time the Golden Goose is really sick, on life support. CCC is free in its totality, but sucks, satellite radio costs money and is only slightly better, and internet radio has a technological tether. Whichever of these sources changes to meet the consumer's needs more adequately, but also extends the ability to lead its customers with "cool" uniqueness is the one that will be the future. The question is, what happens to the music industry in the meanwhile. Rick Rubin's power and influence reside here. Make good pop music. Rock or otherwise, and people will buy the music. Radio is the marketing. When terrestrial radio plays a song that really stokes the fires of the public, nothing can match radio's ability to create a groundswell of support. People will buy the music and buy it fast, because they "have to have it." Its a proven fact. Where the current, disjointed radio configuration hurts record companies most is very, very few acts can create that momentum anymore.
__________________
My Song of the Week is by Charlotte Hatherley and its called Alexander Another great one from her new album! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3uEO...layer_embedded Next SOTW is by Juliette Lewis and its called Romeo Yes, THAT Juliette Lews. She's been rockin' around for a while and this song is shockingly good. No, really! http://www.last.fm/music/Juliette+Lewis/_/Romeo |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Charlie |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
Man I hope he can't save it... it needs to be killed...
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Rate This Thread | |
|
|