PDA

View Full Version : Education Part ll


JOEBIALEK
30 Oct 2005, 03:02 PM
This is the second part to an earlier writing about education in the United States. As you may recall, I advocated for the privatization of all schools from kindergarten to graduate studies. This piece will focus on the curriculum that needs to be followed.

Everytime I encounter someone in the workplace, I am reminded of just how much we have failed to properly educate United States citizens in the fundamentals of communication: reading, writing and speaking. Few would argue that the time is long overdue for the United States to "get back to the basics" of a fully functional education system. We need to exclusively focus on the development of communication skills from kindergarten to eighth grade along with annual testing that measures apptitude and interest. Training in mathematics should be limited to addition, subtraction, multiplication and division. Unless communication skills are fully mastered, there is no need to advance to high school.

For those who graduate to high school, the emphasis could evolve into a curriculum of philosophy, sociology, economics, psychology, science and religious studies. Books such as "For Dummies" and "The Complete Idiot's Guide" could be used to foster an understanding of different religions. Athletic activity would be strictly confined to cardio vascular exercises and all sports would be eliminated. While there would still be an emphasis on communication skills, the focus would now be on developing a foundation of basic knowledge so as to be able to graduate to college. Testing for apptitude and interest would continue through high school increasing the chances of picking the right field of study . Those not continuing on to college would enter some type of apprenticeship training for the purpose of learning a trade. For those who do graduate to college, the student would continue to study an advanced version of the same curriculum as high school but only for the first two years then they would complete their education by strictly focusing on coursework designed to train them in their field of study. Nearing graduation, internships would be required to begin the transition to the working world. Think of how different our society would be if our education system could just teach the fundamentals of reading, writing and speaking.

CablinasianRam
30 Oct 2005, 03:50 PM
Those are all excellent ideas which could improve the state of education in our country. However, I feel the only way to truly reform our education system and have it become effective is not to privitize it, it's to nationalize it. We need it to be the center of attention in this country and in order for that to happen, it has to be a national issue.

To be honest though, if parents are going to continue not preparing thier children for the world, we need to start school much earlier.

markalot
30 Oct 2005, 07:11 PM
Those are all excellent ideas which could improve the state of education in our country. However, I feel the only way to truly reform our education system and have it become effective is not to privitize it, it's to nationalize it. We need it to be the center of attention in this country and in order for that to happen, it has to be a national issue.

To be honest though, if parents are going to continue not preparing thier children for the world, we need to start school much earlier.


Oh good, and when the republicans are in power the first thing we can nationalize is the teaching of creat ... I'm sorry, intelligent design. Think before you turn over things to the government.

JOEBIALEK
08 Nov 2005, 06:37 PM
good points

ms. chevious
08 Nov 2005, 07:02 PM
I am reminded of just how much we have failed to properly educate United States citizens in the fundamentals of communication: reading, writing and speaking.

as a university professor who encounters HS grads who can't write a complete sentence on a daily basis, let me offer a few conjectures in response to this claim:

1. the reason why we are failing to educate "the masses" is b/c we, as a nation, place little value on education itself - it is merely an instrument, a means to a greater salary. in fact, it is "uncool" or "unamerican" to be "too" intellectual (ref: 2004 prez campaign). if intelligence was socially valued, then students would be more motivated to learn. this is not an issue of public/private schools (i.e., of school efficiency), it's one of social norms and values.

2. the ways in which we attempt to measure "knowledge" don't foster critical thought (see: NCLB, proficiency tests). if we continue to educate in the banking model, students will never learn to *think* for themselves. however, once people start thinking for themselves, they usually demand changes in the status quo.

3. the kinds of "knowledge" we value - science! math! progress! money! - are emphasized to the detrement of the humanities and the arts. hence, little writing education.

4. entropy: people tend towards laziness - the minimum effort required. i don't know if anything can change this. you can only teach students who want to learn; the others will ignore you.

Sovrana
08 Nov 2005, 07:40 PM
4. entropy: people tend towards laziness - the minimum effort required. i don't know if anything can change this. you can only teach students who want to learn; the others will ignore you.

....until it is time for them to complete evaluations. :mad: