PDA

View Full Version : Rolling Stones flap


AmericanScience
10 Aug 2005, 06:33 PM
http://olympics.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=entertainmentNews&storyID=2005-08-10T191251Z_01_N10449535_RTRIDST_0_ENTERTAINMENT-MUSIC-STONES-DC.XML

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - The Rolling Stones, not exactly a band at the forefront of rock 'n' roll activism, are taking aim at the American right with a new song on their upcoming album, according to Newsweek magazine.

The track, "Sweet Neo Con," boasts the line, "You call yourself a Christian, I call you a hypocrite/You call yourself a patriot, well I think you're full of s---," according to the weekly newsmagazine.

"It is direct," singer Mick Jagger was quoted as saying, adding that his collaborator, Keith Richards, was "a bit worried" about a backlash because the guitarist lives in the United States and Jagger does not.

In an interview to be broadcast Wednesday on syndicated TV show Extra, Jagger said the song was not aimed at anyone specifically, such as President Bush.

"It certainly is very critical of certain policies of the administration, but so what! Lots of people are critical," Jagger said, according to an advance transcript.

"Sweet Neo Con" is one of 16 tracks featured on the Stones' new album, "A Bigger Bang," which comes out in the United States on Sept. 6, and a day earlier internationally. It was not featured on a 12-track advance CD circulated to critics. The group's publicist was traveling and not able to confirm the quoted lyrics or provide the complete lyrics.

The band is currently rehearsing in Toronto ahead of a world tour that begins on Aug. 21 in Boston. It will play a club show Wednesday for 1,000 fans at Toronto's Phoenix Concert Theatre. Tickets were priced at just C$10 ($8.26), a far cry from the tour's $478 top price.

In their 43-year career, the Stones have observed political developments in songs like 1968's "Street Fighting Man," but have generally avoided taking sides. Notable exceptions included the 1983 single "Undercover (of the Night)," about civil rights abuse in Latin America, and 1991's Gulf War-related track "Highwire."

DogStarMan
11 Aug 2005, 07:13 AM
Who listens to The Rolling Stones anymore? God, they suck.

Shimmercore
11 Aug 2005, 10:13 AM
The new Stones album is supposed to be right up there with Exile on Main Street and the classic Stones sound. I heard the latest single on the local rock dial and I thought to myself,"Who is ripping off the Stones?" Much to my surprise, I found out it WAS the Stones. It's pretty rockin'. The Stones should never get political. They are entertainers and they should be writing what they know best and that's sex, drugs, and rock n roll. What's the point in dissing half your audience with a stab against the neo-cons?!? What the F do they know about American Patriotism?

aqualou
11 Aug 2005, 10:39 AM
The new Stones album is supposed to be right up there with Exile on Main Street and the classic Stones sound.
but will anybody hear it?

The Sheck
11 Aug 2005, 10:41 AM
The new Stones album is supposed to be right up there with Exile on Main Street and the classic Stones sound.

Did they fund a Time Machine project with the earnings from the last tour? It ain't happening otherwise...

tobedawg
11 Aug 2005, 11:56 AM
I was looking at the cover of a music magazine a couple of years back ("BLENDER" I think it was), and I was wondering why they put a wrinkly old Grandmother on the cover? From a distance this woman looked horrid and age hadn't appeared to treat her well..

Low and Behold, it was a picture of Keith Richards..

The Stones have put out so many "comeback" Albums and done so many "Comeback" tours, Do they REALLY need any more money? Hang it up, Guys!

The Big Crunch
11 Aug 2005, 12:10 PM
The new Stones album is supposed to be right up there with Exile on Main Street and the classic Stones sound.
I'll believe it when I hear it. Exile is my choice for greatest rock 'n roll album EVER recorded, so Bigger Bang has got it's work cut out for it.

I may agree with the sentiment of "Sweet Neo-Con", but for the most part I hate pointedly political songs (especially when they have ridiculously corny titles..."Sweet Neo-Con"???). There are some exceptions (The Dead Kennedy's immediately come to mind) but usually directly political tunes sound totally forced and come across as dated almost upon release.

On a somewhat related note, I was talking with a friend this weekend and we decided that while Steve Earle's political albums haven't been terrible, it would have been much better for him as an artist (and for all of Steve's fans) if Kerry had won. That way he could start recording a "proper" follow-up to Transcendental Blues.

AmericanScience
12 Aug 2005, 01:56 AM
They are entertainers and they should be writing what they know best and that's sex, drugs, and rock n roll. What's the point in dissing half your audience with a stab against the neo-cons?!? What the F do they know about American Patriotism?Old people should not sing about sex. Simple rule. Know it, live it.

As far as American Patriotism... Let's say they sang a song dissin' racism in half of the American South. Why dis racism and dis half your audience? I dunno, maybe they believe what they say. Seems simple.

DaHood
12 Aug 2005, 02:30 AM
The Stones are grandfathered in (no pun intended, seriously) as one of the greatest rock and roll bands of all time. They're still some of the best musicians in rock history and deserve respect. When will they stop? I don't know, but I'm impressed as hell that they can still do it. They've written and recorded some of the best music in rock history and even today can blow 90% of the bands in the charts away from a standpoint of musicianship. Kudos to them.

loveydovey
12 Aug 2005, 08:21 AM
God, I hope my mother doesn't hear about this. She was the biggest Stones fan EVER as a young'un, and everything they've done for the past 30 years has made her more and more depressed . . . she secretly wishes they all would have died in a bus accident in the mid-70s.

BigSugar
12 Aug 2005, 10:45 AM
The Stones are grandfathered in (no pun intended, seriously) as one of the greatest rock and roll bands of all time. They're still some of the best musicians in rock history and deserve respect.\

i may have agreed with you up until the last time i saw the stones in Columbus. Ron Wood was so fucked up he couldn't play. he stepped on his cord, pulled it out and didn't realize it. he then continued to "play" as if nothing was happening, sat down and "jammed" and barely noticed when the tech came running out to plug him back in.

they're shite now. old, dried up shite trying to stay relevant in their Depends as they take Detrol LA to control their bladder problems. fuck them to hell.

the_birds
12 Aug 2005, 11:48 AM
Sugar, every band gets a pass or two for a bad performance. I've seen my share.

I don't care if The Stones are from England or from Mars, I like what they are saying in the song and I am glad they are saying it. Even, if I haven't heard it.

And kudos to them for having 'the Stones' to not back off of the harsh language.

The Stones are one of the best bands to ever make Rock and if they can have one good song off each album, they are still okay to me. How many bands can't even do that. I've heard a song from this CD and its good. No band stays at their zenith, all of them die or decline...

Vodka-7
12 Aug 2005, 12:22 PM
Great marketing ploy, anyway.