PDA

View Full Version : Intifada, Iraqi Style


yoshomon
10 Apr 2004, 11:39 AM
Intifada, Iraqi Style

by Naomi Klein > April 9 2004

April 9, 2003 was the day Baghdad fell to U.S. forces. One year later, it is rising up against them.

Donald Rumsfeld claims that the resistance is just a few "thugs, gangs and terrorists." This is dangerous, wishful thinking. The war against the occupation is now being fought out in the open, by regular people defending their homes and neighbourhoods — an Iraqi intifada.

"They stole our playground," an eight-year-old boy in Sadr City told me this week, pointing at six tanks parked in a soccer field, next to a rusty jungle gym. The field is a precious bit of green in an area of Baghdad that is otherwise a swamp of raw sewage and uncollected garbage.

Sadr City has seen little of Iraq's multi-billion-dollar "reconstruction," which is partly why Muqtader Sadr and his Mahadi army have so much support here. Before U.S. occupation chief Paul Bremer provoked Sadr into an armed conflict by shutting down his newspaper and arresting and killing his deputies, the Mahadi army was not fighting coalition forces, it was doing their job for them.

After all, in the year it has controlled Baghdad, the Coalition Provisional Authority still hasn’t managed to get the traffic lights working or to provide the most basic security for civilians. So in Sadr City, Sadr's so-called "outlaw militia" can be seen engaged in such subversive activities as directing traffic and guarding factories from looters. In a way, the Mahadi army is as much Bremer’s creation as it al Sadr’s: it was Bremer who created Iraq's security vacuum — Sadr simply filled it.

But as the June 30 “handover” to Iraqi control approaches, Bremer now sees Sadr and the Mahadi as a threat that must be taken out — along with the communities that have grown to depend on them. Which is why stolen playgrounds were only the start of what I saw in Sadr City this week. At Al -Thawra Hospital, I met Raad Daier, a 36-year-old ambulance driver with a bullet in his lower abdomen, one of 12 shots fired at his ambulance from a U.S. Humvee. According to hospital officials, at the time of the attack, he was carrying six people injured by U.S. forces, including a pregnant woman who had been shot in the stomach and lost her child.

I saw charred cars that dozens of eye-witnesses said had been hit by U.S. missiles, and confirmed with local hospitals that their drivers had been burned alive. I also visited Block 37 of the Sadr City's Chuadir District, a row of houses where every door was riddled with holes. Resident said U.S. tanks rolled down their street firing into their homes. Five people were killed, including Murtada Muhammad, age 4.

And yesterday I saw something that I feared more than any of this: a copy of the Koran with a bullet hole through it. It was lying in the ruins of what was Sadr's headquarters in Sadr City. A few hours earlier, witnesses say that two U.S. tanks broke down the walls of the center while two guided missiles pierced its roof, leaving giant craters in the floor and missile debris behind.

The worst damage, however, was done by hand. The clerics at the Sadr office say that U.S. soldiers entered the building and crudely shredded photographs of the Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the top Shiite cleric in Iraq. When I arrived at the destroyed center, the floor was covered in torn religious texts, including several copies of the Koran that been ripped and shot through with bullets. And it did not escape the notice of the Shiites here that hours earlier, U.S. soldiers had bombed a Sunni mosque in Fallouja.

For months the White House has been making ominous predictions of a civil war breaking out between the majority Shiites, who believe it's their turn to rule Iraq, and the minority Sunnis, who want to hold on to the privileges they amassed under Hussein's regime. But this week the opposite appears to have taken place. Both Sunni and Shiite have seen their neighbourhoods attacked and their religious sites desecrated. Up against a shared enemy, they are beginning to bury ancient rivalries and join forces against the occupation. Instead of a civil war, they are on the verge of building a common front.

You could see it at the mosques in Sadr City on Thursday: thousands of Shiites lined up to donate blood, destined for Sunnis hurt in the attacks in Fallouja. “We should thank Paul Bremer,” Salih Ali told me. “He has finally united Iraq. Against him.”

RichmondVA
13 Apr 2004, 12:58 PM
For whatever reason, things are really starting to get nasty. . . and those calls that this could become another Vietnam aren't looking quite so far-fetched.

If you don't like Yoshomon's article, consider it strictly from an American standpoint. 682 US dead overall. As of today, 78 US deaths just in April. And another one today.

RichmondVA
13 Apr 2004, 03:12 PM
This is kind of grim too: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=535&e=3&u=/ap/20040413/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_uneasy_truce

"If they're trying to find a peaceful way out of this, great. But at this point, there seem to be few options other than to get innocents out and level it, wipe it clear off the map," said 1st Lt. Frank Dillbeck, scanning the city's outskirts with binoculars during a relative lull in fighting.

-------

Christiansen said he was unfazed by concerns that the gunmen may be using the cease-fire to regroup.

"I really don't care; they're all gonna die," he said.

Meanwhile, Marines were resupplying, running coils of barbed wire, food, ammunition and fuel to troops dug into the city outskirts. Lt. Brian McDonald, 25, of Ashburn, Va., who led out a supply convoy, also expected things to get worse.

"Once the whole cease-fire is over, it's going to start getting a little wilder out here," he said. "They're firing at us every night; sooner or later enough is enough."

drexel dave
13 Apr 2004, 03:13 PM
he who lives by the sword, shall die by the sword.

yoshomon
13 Apr 2004, 04:06 PM
Originally posted by drexel dave
he who lives by the sword, shall die by the sword.

except the people dying aren't the ones who plotted up the damn war. the folks dying are mostly poor iraqis and working class americans in the army.

your leaders can't protect you - they can only get you killed.

yoshomon
13 Apr 2004, 07:21 PM
Something else people don't really think about is the fact that most of the Iraqi army were forced into service by Suddam's regime. So most of the Iraqi soldiers killed were essentially "innocent" (whatever the hell that means).

After the first gulf war, the US slaughtered Iraqi soldiers returning home to the cities. These armed soldiers could/would have attempted to topple Suddam's regime (their only opposition would have been the republican guard troops).

The conservative estimate for civilian deaths in this war is around 10,000.

RichmondVA
13 Apr 2004, 07:49 PM
What worries me are two things:

1) the way this thing seems to be falling apart.
2) our inability to know and fully fathom exactly what's going on.

It really sounds like this is getting nasty-- US soldiers stating the only way to accomplish our goals is just to destroy everything, the army calling for more troops, etc.

Again, puposely staying away from justifications for the war or lying or what have you, I wonder if we (not even just US citizens but the administration itself) are fully aware of what we want to accomplish, how to accomplish it, and whether it's worth the price.

It's very hard for me to get my head around the attitude both sides are approaching where it is kill (in a nasty way) or be killed. Arguably some of the extremists in the middle East have always been that way. But the US troops have not. I'm not blaming them-- it's like the guy said "sooner or later enough is enough." But when you've been over there too long and seen so much death and destruction bad things start to happen.