PDA

View Full Version : Woohoo!! PG and E gets ANOTHER Tax Cut this Year!!!


tobedawg
18 Nov 2003, 12:23 PM
From CNN.com ..

Congress close to approving major energy bill
House expected to take up legislation Tuesday

Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Posted: 9:08 AM EST (1408 GMT)

WASHINGTON (AP) -- After months of sometimes bitter wrangling, Congress is on the verge of approving a far-reaching energy bill that would provide billions of dollars in tax breaks for oil, gas and coal industries and bring an economic boon to farmers who grow corn for ethanol.

House and Senate negotiators finished the bill late Monday after rejecting a string of amendments from Democrats who criticized the GOP-crafted legislation as a "hodgepodge of subsidies" for traditional energy industries and harmful to the environment.

Republicans countered that the bill, including $23 billion in tax incentives, provided a blueprint for diversifying the nation's energy sources and improving the reliability of electricity transmission systems.

Senate conferees approved the measure on an 8-5 vote after House negotiators approved it by voice vote. Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-North Dakota, joined the seven GOP senators in supporting the legislation.

The House moved quickly with plans to take up the legislation Tuesday. The Senate could finish the bill by week's end, sending President Bush legislation on one of his top domestic priorities.

"This is a solid agreement," Sen. Pete Domenici, R-New Mexico, chairman of the energy conference, said as he urged colleagues to reject any amendments that would significantly alter a bill that was cobbled together during two-and-a-half months of closed-door negotiations.

"I don't think we can take a risk of undoing this," Domenici said.

In a series of amendments, Democrats tried unsuccessfully to block liability protection for makers of MTBE, a gasoline additive that contaminates drinking water; require utilities to use more renewable fuels to make electricity, and strengthen laws against Enron-related power market abuses.

The bill would cost the government an estimate $32 billion over 10 years, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office and the Senate Finance Committee staff, including $22.9 billion in tax incentives and $9 billion in direct spending and revenue losses.

Major provisions in the bill
• Tax incentives totaling $14.5 billion for oil, natural gas and coal industries over 10 years.

• More than $5.2 billion in tax credits and other tax benefits for developing renewable energy sources, including tax breaks for corn-based ethanol.

• Doubling the requirement for ethanol in gasoline, a boon to farmers that is widely supported by both Republicans and Democrats.

• Tax subsidies of about $1.5 billion over 10 years for energy efficiency and conservation, including tax credits for energy efficient homes, appliances, use of solar panels, and purchase of hybrid gas-electric cars.

• Federal reliability rules and standards for high-voltage power lines to lessen the likelihood of cascading power failures like the one that produced the huge Northeastern blackout in August.

• A $1.8 billion research project to develop clean coal technology and tax breaks for a new generation of nuclear power plants to ensure diversity in energy sources for electricity production.

• Provisions to speed up permits and ease environmental rules to develop oil and gas resources on federal land.

• Loan guarantees of $18 billion for a pipeline to carry natural gas from Alaska's North Slope to the Midwest.

Wyden: 'Tax goodies'
"We provide billions of dollars in dozens of ways to reduce our dependance on foreign oil," Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-Louisiana, chief of the House negotiators, said.

Domenici said the bill's conservation measures would be enough to replace 100 power plants between now and 2020.

But Democrats argued the legislation would not do nearly enough to redirect the nation's energy priorities or reduce the country's reliance on oil imports.

And they argued that some provisions, such as repealing a 1935 law that limits activities of large utility holding companies, could produce "merger mania" and harm consumers. Those supporting the repeal said the law inhibits investment in electricity infrastructure, including power lines.

Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-New Mexico, said the bill lacked enough incentives to promote domestic energy production or foster energy conservation and fell short of what may be needed to get Wall Street to invest in a $20 billion pipeline to bring natural gas from Alaska's North Slope.

"The tax goodies go to huge energy conglomerates, and most subsidize things that the companies already are doing," complained Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Oregon, another of the conferees. He described the bill as "a hodgepodge of subsidies for the politically well-connected."

Docta
18 Nov 2003, 02:45 PM
criminy, give them a huge tax cut as they gouge consumers with astronomical rate increases, bush will certainly be happy about that.

but the continuance of overtime pay, limitations on media ownership, limiting privatization of federal jobs, family planning aid overseas, opening up trade with cuba...... those our president will f'n veto.

Spending bills face veto threats on overtime pay, media ownership
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Alan Fram

Nov. 17, 2003 | WASHINGTON (AP) -- House-Senate leaders trying to patch together a huge end-of-session spending bill face 16 Bush administration veto threats on issues ranging from overtime pay to media ownership, a top congressional Republican said Monday.

"They're real enough to slow down a conference" of congressional bargainers hoping to resolve the problems within a week, Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, told reporters.

Congress has finished only five of the 13 annual spending bills for the federal budget year that began Oct. 1. Leading lawmakers hope that work on the remaining eight bills -- and on major legislation on Medicare, energy and other issues -- can be completed in time for Congress to adjourn for the year before Thanksgiving.

Though some are more serious than others, the sheer number of veto threats is noteworthy considering that Republicans control both the White House and Congress. The threats underline the conflicting priorities and allegiances at stake for different members of the GOP.

The most intractable issue seems to be an effort by Democrats and some moderate Republicans to derail an administration effort to rewrite rules that govern which workers are entitled to overtime pay.

The GOP-run Senate voted in September to block proposed Labor Department rules that opponents say would make it easier for employers to deny overtime for millions of workers. The House, also run by Republicans, voted narrowly to support the rules, but later cast a nonbinding vote in favor of blocking them.

The administration is insisting the proposed rules be allowed to take effect. Among those who want to block them, however, is Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., an Appropriations subcommittee chairman who faces re-election next November from a state where labor unions have clout.

"All the suggestions we've made" for resolving this, "they just reject," Stevens said.

Another difficult issue is language approved by the House and by a Senate committee that would block a Federal Communications Commission plan to let companies own larger shares of the television market.

Stevens and others said many top lawmakers want to include that language in a huge spending bill they are writing. Administration officials said they are standing by past threats to veto any legislation containing it.

"We certainly stand by it. We have no intention of back off that," said J.T. Young, a spokesman for the White House budget office.

Other veto threats are aimed at provisions including eased restrictions on family planning aid overseas, expanding trade with Cuba, letting private contractors replace some federal workers.

About five of the remaining spending bills could end up being packaged into an enormous measure, in order to save time and make it harder for lawmakers to vote against it.

Included in that bill could be money for the departments of Education, Health and Human Services, Justice, State, Labor, Agriculture, Veterans Affairs, Housing and Urban Development, Commerce and scores of smaller agencies.

Congressional aides say lawmakers are trying to figure out how to pay for about $3.9 billion in extra spending they want for veterans' health care, modernized voting equipment, global AIDS and other programs.

With the administration insisting that Congress find ways to pay for the added spending, the likeliest source of savings are across-the-board cuts in many programs and cancellation of previously approved spending, aides said.